Word on the Streets

Join us for Minnehaha cycletracks Press Conference Sunday


During Sunday's Open Streets event, we are co-hosting a press conference about community support for protected bike lanes ("cycle tracks") on Minnehaha Avenue. Come ride through the "pop-up cycle track" and get a sticker to show your support as part of the crowd!



What: News conference showing community support for a Minnehaha Avenue “cycle track”



When: Sunday, August 11 at 1:30 p.m. (starts promptly at 1:30, so plan to arrive a little before)



Where: 3400 block of Minnehaha Avenue adjacent to a “pop-up cycle track” during the Open Streets Minneapolis event


Hennepin County commissioners consider protected bikeways


On Thursday morning, the Hennepin County Board held a briefing on the proposed reconstruction of Washington and Minnehaha avenues, and the protected bikeways (also known as cycle tracks) proposed for each. The County commissioners listened to presentations by county transportation staff. While the public was allowed to attend the briefing, only the commissioners asked questions and commented.

 


What's a cycle track, anyway?

 


Rose Ryan, Hennepin County bicycle and pedestrian coordinator, defined a cycle track (which is sometime called a protected bikeway) as a bikeway that's physically separated from auto traffic and dedicated to bike use. Buffered bike lanes (like those on Park and Portland avenues) aren't cycle tracks because there's no protection from car traffic, and mixed-use paths (like the Loring Greenway) aren't cycle tracks because they're not dedicated to bike use.

 


The appeal of protected bikeways is well-documented. Study after study has shown cycle tracks to improve the safety of cyclists, and empower women, children, and seniors to ride bikes in cities. Some cycle tracks in Amsterdam and Copenhagen are more than 30 years old, and they've spread to American cities, too: Chicago, Indianapolis, Portland, Atlanta, and more. The Minneapolis Climate Action Plan calls for the construction of 30 new miles of protected bikeways (including cycle tracks) by 2020. The question is just where to put them.

 


The public wants a cycle track on Washington Avenue

 


The county plans to rebuild Washington from Hennepin Avenue to Fifth Avenue by the end of 2015, with the intent to extend the chosen configuration southeast to 35-W at a later time. Craig Twinem, division manager of the county's transportation department, reviewed the public involvement for the Washington Avenue project. After the county reviewed nearly 1500 survey responses collected during two outreach campaigns, the public's voice was clear: they want a protected bikeway.

 


The clear public favorite is known as layout 3A (PDF), which places the curb between the cycle track and parked cars, and trees and landscaping between the bikes and pedestrians. The number of through lanes in either direction would be cut from three to two. County Commissioner Jan Callison asked how traffic could be accommodated by two through lanes instead of three, and Mr. Twinem replied that synchronized traffic lights will improve traffic flow, even with fewer lanes. There was more discussion about auto capacity. Staff explained that they are including long right-turn lanes where needed (including leading up to 3rd Avenue South) and that they would not propose something that they did not feels works from a vehicle traffic flow perspective.

 


Commissioner Peter McLaughlin shifted the frame of the discussion from cars to people, recounting a meeting he had with the chair of Downtown 2025, who strongly supports making Washington less of a barrier between downtown and the Mississippi River. Layout 3A would significantly reduce the pedestrian crossing distance.

 


When asked about the respective costs of the different layouts, Mr. Twinem assured the board that the difference in cost between building a cycle track and rebuilding Washington without a cycle track was negligible. If additional bike-specific signals are required in the final design, these could raise the cost of the project by 2% at the most.

 


Commissioner Linda Higgins asked about when bike-friendly changes could be made to Washington north of Hennepin. Jim Grube, Hennepin County engineer, said that they could restripe the road with bike lanes at any time and implied they could work with Minneapolis to do that to coincide with the reconstruction project.

 


A couple commissioners offered some questions and concerns, and it is clear staff will be looking to address those. The most prominent was about winter maintenance of the cycle track; Assistant County Administrator Debra Brisk from Public Works said that the County is in negotiation with the City to determine who will be responsible for plowing the cycletrack. Commissioner Mike Opat cited 1st Avenue North as a “sore spot” where winter maintenance causes problems.

 


Hennepin County staff will be seeking County Board approval “as soon as possible” for Washington and municipal consent this fall.

 


Reconstructing Minnehaha Avenue

 


Minnehaha Avenue was last rebuilt during the Eisenhower administration, and it's likely that the configuration we choose now will stay put for another 55 years, so it's important to get it right. Project Manager Nick Peterson presented two concept layouts for the thoroughfare: 1) on-road bike lanes with a one-foot buffer, and 2) a two-way raised cycle track on the west side of the street. Both layouts kept the two lanes for car traffic and two parking lanes and add some left-turn lanes at intersections. Like the Washington Avenue project, the cycle track option is no more expensive to build than the alternative, but Mr. Peterson said that additional traffic signals could add a few hundred thousand dollars to the price tag (the potential cost savings from having less road surface were not discussed). The decision comes down to which option will better serve the residents and businesses of the Longellow neighborhood.

 


Mr. Peterson presented a list of advantages and disadvantages associated with each layout option, but the list relied on some myths debunked in Grant's blog post from last month. Many recent studies have shown cycle tracks to be safer than on-street bike lanes. A well-designed cycle track would not require a significant removal of trees or parking spaces, and winter bike-riding would be more convenient on a cycle track, when so many bike lanes are annexed by parked cars in the winter. Diverting novice cyclists from the sidewalk to the inviting cycle track would be a boon to pedestrians, too.

 


We hope the county commissioners consider the interests of all street-users as they weigh their options on these important projects. Washington and Minnehaha are great places for protected bikeways. 

 

Discussing the history of car-dependence with Christopher Wells


On July 31st, a group of history buffs and bike enthusiasts sat on Tiger Sushi's patio to hear Chris Wells talk about his book, Car Country: An Environmental History. Wells, a professor of environmental studies at Macalester College, started by explaining how he had experienced car-dependence personally, then he explained the main thrust of his book, and finally he took questions from the audience.



Freedom and car-dependence



When he was growing up in Atlanta, Wells eagerly anticipated his 16th birthday, because a driver's license gave him a freedom to move about the city that he didn't have before. He felt trapped without a car, because there was no other way for a teenager to get around. Atlanta's transit system, MARTA, catered to suburban commuters and tourists. Riding a bike around the city wasn't safe because there were no bikeways. The city's low density and monumental freeways made walking impractical.



Then, Wells lived in cities that weren't car-dependent. He went to college in a small, walkable town in western Massachusetts, and he went to graduate school in bike-friendly Madison, WI. His first teaching job was in Switzerland, where a great public transportation system accommodated the carless. He realized that the trapped feeling he'd had in Atlanta was a direct result of Atlanta's built environment, not some innate American affinity for driving.



How did the vast majority of America become car country? Chris noted that in 1900, the biggest business in the U.S. was railroads, and that most urbanites traveled by streetcar. Cars were unreliable and inefficient, and rural roads were decrepit. Only twenty years later, 8 million American cars were registered. Building car-friendly (and later, car-dependent) landscapes required a great deal of intervention from all levels of government, and that's what Car Country is about.



Questions from the audience



The first question was about the recent drop in car ownership and driving. Professor Wells explained that sprawling development over the last century increased the number of vehicle miles traveled. The burst housing bubble stopped the expansion of the farthest-flung exurban developments, and the resulting recession means that Americans have less money to spend on transportation. He ended his answer with a question: "What happens when the economy comes back?"



One activist in the audience asked about traffic engineers, who, in her experience, often fight to preserve the status quo. Wells said that the select group of traffic engineers he's talked to is open to new perspectives on transportation. He discussed how architects, landscape architects, and city planners all see transportation differently, and that one's ideal system depends on one's point of view. But not all points of view are given equal weight. A new book by Cliff Ellis and Joseph DiMento called Changing Lanes examines the outsized role that highway engineers have played in building urban freeways that destroy neighborhoods and cost billions of dollars. Professor Wells assured the audience that some of his best friends are traffic engineers, and noted that the profession had its origins in managing streetcar systems. The first traffic lights were actually designed to get automobiles out of the way of streetcars.



169-494 interchange in the southwest suburbs"What's the best way to repurpose car country?" asked another member of the audience. Wells replied that he likes the complete streets guidelines, which take a holistic view of street users, instead of just focusing exclusively on pleasing motorists driving 35 miles per hour. The philosophy takes into account the interests of cyclists, people with disabilities, pedestrians, and local businesses in street design. Wells mentioned that Holland is a country with a great network of complete streets.



Then, the conversation turned from who uses streets to who pays for them. An audience member asked Professor Wells to clarify how much of roads are covered by the gas tax, as opposed to sales, property, and income taxes. "Property owners have always subsidized streets and roads," Wells said. The gas tax, when its revenue was at its zenith, covered about 60% of interstate freeways, which constitute only 7% of the highways in America. Wells also noted that, due to inflation and increasing fuel economy, the gas tax revenue (in real dollars) has been declining for decades. When speaking to his college students, Wells likens toll-free roads to the students' meal plans. A student will go out to eat less if they're on the meal plan, because the meal at the school cafeteria has already been paid for (which is not to say it's cheaper than all the alternatives). A person deciding how to get across the city might choose to drive on the freeway, not because driving is the most economical mode of transportation, but because the infrastructure has already been paid for, so why not use it?



"Who paved the first roads, anyway?" was the next question. Professor Wells confirmed that the League of American Wheelmen paved the first rural roads, which were used by urban cyclists for touring. Before public action was used to pave the roads, the farmers who owned the land surrounding them had no incentive to spend money to make the roads inviting to outsiders. A cultural shift resulted in rural roads being seen as public, instead of private, amenities.



The last question was about this conception of limited-access roads as public goods by economists. Wells said that he's a historian, and that economists use different tools to understand the world. He'd like to see economists take into account the full costs of freeways, which would likely make them less attractive to build. But once they're built, it is expensive and disruptive to remove them (well, maybe not all of them). Ultimately, economists have a point, but it's one worth questioning.



The Coalition thanks Professor Wells for the great talk, and we encourage you to buy Car Country at a local bookstore or online. We also welcome suggestions for future speakers. Just leave us a comment below!



Want to catch other events like this? Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter, and we'll keep you posted. 



Satellite photo of the Hwy 169/I-494 interchange construction from Google Maps.



© Copyright 2024 Our Streets Minneapolis. All rights reserved.