Word on the Streets

Important Park/Portland Public Meeting August 30


The city and county are holding a community meeting to share plans that involve restriping Park and Portland Avenues to calm traffic and create a safer environment for bicyclists and pedestrians. It's Thursday, Aug. 30, from 6:30 – 9 p.m. (presentation 7:15 p.m.) at The Center for Changing Lives (Lutheran Social Services), 2400 Park Ave. S., Conference Room 104.



This is an essential opportunity to make these high-speed streets much friendlier and safer for bicycling in addition to a whole host of other community benefits. We hope you will attend. It's imperative that there is a strong presence from bicycling supporters. You can see a handout with the county and city proposal here. The proposal is a significant step in the right direction. The latest information from the County on the project is available here.



The key messages we encourage attendees to share include (full background and details are below for each of these points):




  1. I support converting Park and Portland from 3 lanes for cars to 2 lanes for cars. The city and county are proposing this conversion on much of the route because traffic levels don't warrant the 3 lanes. We want them to convert it for the entire stretch to improve bicycling, but more importantly to calm traffic and offer many benefits for the neighborhood.


  2. I support making Park and Portland much better for biking by providing a buffer between the car lanes and the bike lane. The county and city will be proposing this in most areas. (We will continue to push for parking-protected bike lanes and would encourage others to as well.)


  3. I think the city and county should--in the future--add significant new green space and provide a curb-protected bike lane (or cycle track) to maximize the value of the space gained by removing a car lane. Park and Portland should be signature community assets not freeways. They could have a green spine that connects from Minnehaha Creek to the Mississippi River and Stone Arch Bridge! Curb work is not part of this project, but a number of potential pots of funding--from stormwater management to capital improvement funds--might be feasible for these valuable improvements. It won't happen this year (or, likely, in the next few years), but this meeting provides an opportunity to get people thinking about what could be if we do #1 and #2 now.



Background

Hennepin County is repaving these streets between Interstate 94 and 46th Street South in late September. The repaving provides an opportunity to do some basic changes to the design of the street.



The streets are currently each one ways with three lanes for cars, a left-sided bike lane, and parking on both sides. The speed limit is 35 mph, but the lights are timed for faster than that and traffic routinely exceeds 40 mph. Originally made wide one-ways before 35W was built, they carry no more than 13,500 cars a day at any point and often much less--amounts that mean that the streets are normally quite empty of cars, which adds to the speeding problems.



There are more than 600 bicyclists a day on each road north of the Midtown Greenway making them one of the busiest bike routes in the city. Yet, they are very uncomfortable streets for the vast majority of bicyclists and they have some high-crash locations, especially at intersections where there are a lot of left-turning cars. There are no other north-south bike routes for 9 blocks to the west (Blaisdell/1st Ave combo) and 13 blocks to the east (17th Ave Bicycle Blvd coming next year. Dennis Dumm was tragically struck and killed while biking by a left-turning semi truck at Park and 14th Street.



There are up to about 1000 pedestrians a day on each road, likely with more in the downtown areas. There are common complaints of it being hard for pedestrians to cross these streets. Louise Laugen was hit and killed while crossing Park Avenue at 27th Street last winter. Her death and the long history of concerns led to the installation of a new stop light there.



Local residents have long complained about these streets and there is little doubt that the freeway feel negatively impacts property values. The city has had some discussions about whether to convert them to two-way streets. The Access Minneapolis Transportation plan adopted in 2008 includes a plan to study a potential conversion to two-way streets north of Franklin Avenue. That study has not yet happened, and such a conversion is outside the scope of this year's project.



You can find more about the history of these road in this excellent Twin Cities Daily Planet article.





Can this urban freeway be transformed? It definitely can with your help August 30!



County and City Proposal for Immediate Improvements

As of August 23, a proposal for the design of streets is not yet available online, but you can see a copy of the proposal that is being handed out to local residents today.  The proposal is a good step in the right direction. We see opportunities to improve the proposed changes for this fall and we see opportunities to get additional benefits in the long-term (see #3 below). Thanks to the staff and elected officials that have worked hard to get the proposal to this point. The proposal includes




  • Removing an auto lane in most areas south of downtown on both roads, but retaining three lanes in several blocks around Lake Street.


  • A wider and buffered bike lane on both roads. The buffer would be narrow in the sections where three auto lanes are retained.


  • The proposal moves the bike lane to the right side on Park Avenue. It stays on the left side on Portland Avenue until 35th Street (staff note there are a lot more right-turning cars than left-turning ones in that stretch). We are generally supportive of moving the bike lane to the right side on these streets because that is where drivers expect them.


  • There would be "transition zones" on Portland Avenue between 35th and 36th Streets and on Park between north of Lake Street and the Midtown Greenway where bike lanes would be on both sides of the street. The Portland transition zone in to allow for people to transition from the left sided bike lane north of there to the right sided bike lane that continues south (soon all the way to Richfield). The Park transition zone is to support access to the Midtown Greenway, which has an access point on the left side of the road.


  • They may add "signal provisions" for bikes at the stop lights at Portland and 35th Street and at Park and 27th and 28th Streets. It isn't clear what those provisions would entail.


  • Maintaining parking throughout



We understand that staff are planning to bring a couple different options for how to buffer the bike lane and how to make connections from the bike lane to the Midtown Greenway. There are not details yet on how connections would be made between the proposed left-sided bike lane on Portland and the Midtown Greenway (access is on the right side).



More Details on Key Messages for Public Meeting



1. I support converting Park and Portland from 3 lanes for cars to 2 lanes for cars.

The city and county are proposing removing an auto lane in most areas south of downtown on both roads. We want them to convert it for the entire stretch, including downtown. This may mean that there is a little more traffic congestion in a few areas during the afternoon rush hour, but that slight disruption would be more than offset by improvements in quality of life of nearby residents and the improved pedestrian and bicycling environment. Some drivers would find other routes or go at slightly different times of day and some people would now be comfortable biking instead of driving and make the switch. And downtown needs a change here. These roads are surrounded by a lot of surface parking lots that should be more. These roads are ghost towns downtown at all times of day but rush hour--why not use that space (see #3 below for more info) for something more?



2. I support making Park and Portland much better for biking by providing a buffer between the car lanes and the bike lane.

The county and city will be proposing this in most areas. (We will continue to push for parking-protected bike lanes and would encourage others to as well.) A note that the Midtown Greenway Coalition, Hope Community, and the City of Minneapolis Bicycle Advisory Committee are among the groups that have endorsed having a protected bike lane added to replace a lane of traffic on Park and Portland. A couple writers at streets.mn see the great idea as well.



3. I think the city and county should--in the future--add significant new green space and provide a curb-protected bike lane (or cycle track) to maximize the value of the space gained by removing a car lane.

Park and Portland should be signature community assets not freeways. Imagine the possible uses for 11 feet of space (assuming taking a lane of traffic). You could add greenspace and a cycle track to create a green spine that connects from Minnehaha Creek to the Mississippi River and Stone Arch Bridge with Midtown Greenway, Swedish Institute, new Vikings Stadium, and Guthrie Theater right along the way! Or you could add parking spaces by having diagonal parking on one or both sides. You could add rain gardens to treat millions of gallons of stormwater saving pollution and money. You could provide space for community gardens or community art. And these visions are possible because Park and Portland are such wide streets--among the widest in the city.



Curb work is not part of this project, but a number of potential pots of funding--from stormwater management to capital improvement funds--might be feasible for these valuable improvements. It won't happen this year (or, likely, in the next few years), but this meeting provides an opportunity to get people thinking about what could be if we do #1 and #2 now.



Let's explore a little more the "green spine" idea with new green space, a cycletrack, and stormwater management improvements...





One potential way to add a cycle track and new green space in the future. Thanks to Brendon Slotterback (http://netdensity.net/)



A second potential way... Thanks to Brendon Slotterback (http://netdensity.net/)



Meeting business and civic goals for downtown Minneapolis

The Downtown Council recently adopted its Downtown 2025 Plan, which includes initiatives to "create a consistently compelling downtown experience" and "create and sustain a green infrastructure and showcase the riverfront." The plan wants to create "green corridors" to improve the downtown experience, spur development, connect neighborhoods, and help people discover and explore the river more.



Meanwhile, the RiverFirst Initiative (a partnership between the Minneapolis Parks Foundation, the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board, and the City of Minneapolis) also thinks that Minneapolis should “restore its identity as a city of the mighty Mississippi and leverage one of three great rivers of the world as a source for economic development and community and cultural vitality.”



What better way to get people to the river than a green corridor on Portland that runs all the way to the Stone Arch Bridge? What better location to spur development than along Park and Portland with their many adjacent surface parking lots and new Vikings stadium? And what better road to fit a green corridor on than these wide roads that connect all the way to Minnehaha Creek?



Added greenspace

Adding 10 feet of greenspace along 4 miles of each Park and Portland would mean more than 9 acres of new green!



Stormwater management

Park and Portland Avenues include over 1.3 million square feet of pavement (22 football fields of asphalt). When it rains, stormwater carries all the salt, sand, trash, oil, antifreeze, etc. down the storm drains towards Powderhorn Lake, Minnehaha Creek, and the Mississippi River. In an average year, Park and Portland shed over 20 million gallons of polluted runoff. Yet, roadways are exempt form city stormwater fees. Currently, property owners pay to manage and treat the polluted stormwater that flows from these roads. Added greenspace could be used to help collect and treat much of that stormwater--saving money and pollution.



Property values

Many studies have found that Americans are willing to pay a premium to live in areas that are more walkable, have greenspace, and have access to bicycling facilities. For example, in Minneapolis, home values have been found to increase by $510 for every 400 meters closer they are to the Midtown Greenway. Who wouldn't rather live near 10 feet of greenspace rather than 10 feet of asphalt?



Traffic calming

Many new cycletracks have been show to reduce speeding, which makes the road safer, quieter, and a better neighbor for residents and businesses. In a Washington, D.C. example, 66% of motorists exceeded the speed limit before a cycletrack was installed and only 26% after. In a New York City example, 75% of motorists exceeded speed limit before and only 20% after (source).



We could go on and on with the potential benefits of this next step vision (we didn't even get into biking benefits!). We hope you find it exciting as well, and will bring it up at the meeting August 30.



What are your thoughts on Park and Portland? Are you going to the meeting (and telling your friends)? Do you have any questions about any details?


Green as far as the eye can see


Have you been down Bryant recently?  Green as far as the eye can see!  What a lovely sight eh?!



More info on the Bryant Avenue S. Bicycle Boulevard:  click here


Franklin Avenue public meeting report


This is a guest post from volunteer Philip Schwartz. The Bicycle Coalition has been advocating for adding bike lanes to Franklin Avenue for the past year. Our position is that we want to see bike lanes on Franklin west of where they end in Seward all the way to Hennepin Avenue. Philip offers a summary of a recent public meeting and his detailed opinion on the bike lanes. Offer your thoughts in the comments!



A couple weeks ago, Bike Walk Twin Cities held a public meeting to go over the options for bike and walk improvements on Franklin Avenue. An option was presented by representatives from Toole Design Group and CH2MHill that included bike lanes on most of the corridor, and shared travel lanes at the most challenging section, between 4th and Columbus Aves. (The details were nicely laid out in a previous blog post.) This was followed by a short Q&A session before breaking into small groups to allow for more engaging conversations.



As someone who hasn't attended too many public meetings, I wasn't quite sure what to expect. There was a good turnout of about thirty people, which included not just active cycling advocates and representatives from various community groups, but also interested members of the surrounding neighborhoods. The general consensus was that Franklin is without question a harsh place for pedestrians and cyclists. No one spoke against bike lanes. The main concern about the presented plans was the use of shared lanes, which look not too different from those on Hennepin Avenue in downtown, and if you've ever ridden there during rush hour, you know they simply do not work. Other concerns regarded the county's willingness to accept 10' travel lanes, and how things will be configured at high traffic intersections. This is warranted because, unfortunately, in Minneapolis it's not too hard to find that your bike lane has vanished and suddenly you are in the middle of a turn lane. The engineers that sat in on our small group discussions were taking good notes of our ideas, and I look forward to seeing how they respond to our feedback.



I enjoyed the format of this meeting because it allowed me to voice my opinions without having to address an entire room. My main concern was that while the options presented make it easier and safer for all existing users of Franklin, it missed by a long shot on what not only the Minneapolis Bicycle Coalition, but also the city, really need to be aiming for: Attracting new cyclists. I believe strongly in the 8-80 Cities concept, which means that if a city is safe for an 8 year old and an 80 year old to get around freely, the city will work better for everyone. The options presented lacked in that aspect by shoehorning a 5' bike lane right alongside traffic that usually moves at 40 MPH with nothing but a strip of paint keeping the cyclists "safe," just so that there is still room for vehicle storage (parking). We cannot settle for this. While complete separation from traffic at this point is not part of the project, buffered bike lanes, similar to those on Fremont Ave. N. are really the only option we should accept. This will make things more difficult for motorists when it comes to congestion and parking, but we need to ask ourselves if giving priority to a safe, comfortable, and family friendly bike route on the only viable east-west route for bikes in the area is something that is worth compromising. We need to stop accepting the bare minimum when it comes to our bike infrastructure, hold the city and county to higher standards that will work for everyone, and put Minneapolis back in its place as the number one bike city in the United States.



What do you want to see on Franklin Avenue?



© Copyright 2024 Our Streets Minneapolis. All rights reserved.